Aerobic Digester Reduces Global Warming Impact, Study Finds

Myers: When did you decide to conduct a Independent Life Cycle Assessment of the aerobic digester solution? And why?

Dyson: The study was done and completed by the University of Delaware. University of Delaware already had two of our digesters in place in their dining hall and they actually reached out to us because they let us know that they were doing a study of the digesters. We just provided them with whatever data we could and their the ones that issued that. We happened to issue it as a press release because the document ending up becoming very favorable to the aerobic digesters. But, it was University of Delaware’s product.

Myers: Results found the technology you use is a environmentally friendly alternative. Can you talk about examples that would not be environmentally friendly?

Dyson: Landfills. The transportation of organic waste to landfills is not environmentally friendly at all. If you look at the life cycle analysis that the University of Delaware did, they did a comparative study between the aerobic digesters and then anaerobic digesters composting and then landfill disposal. The aerobic digesters came out “far away” as the most environmentally friendly from a greenhouse gas perspective. You know global warming from a photo chemical exposure which makes things like smog. So, when you look at the landfill and you look at composting, if you had to put them in order I’d say out of the four things evaluated in the life cycle assessment i would say that the digester, followed by the anaerobic digester, followed by composting, followed by landfilling. There are solutions coming online every day to divert waste from landfill that people need to be evaluating.

Myers: What steps have you taken to make sure your product is not hurting the environment?

Dyson: I think its intuitive to understand that if we’re not sending waste to a landfill, if you’re taking trucks off the road, if you’re using an existing infrastructure, your benefiting, it's benefiting  the environment to do that. If your using trucks and trucks are driving a hundred or more miles to dispose of it, you’ve lost any environmental benefit. Besides that, we are doing research on the digesters for years now. I came on three years ago, to BioHiTech, and we’ve certainly been doing a lot of in depth research since then. To ensure that the effluent that we generate can be put through the sanitary sewer. We’ve done studies to make sure that are not any off gases, like methane, from the digester. The only time methane is present is in the absence of oxygen. So, because we are an aerobic digester that is no methane. If you look at anaerobic digestion they’re capturing the methane. They’re using it for something. At landfills, if you go and look on the internet, you can find websites that talk about what websites are actually using methane gas vs. ones that aren’t. We’ve looked at and compared our technologies to get us to a point where we can very confidently say and back it up with science that we make a environmentally strong beneficial impact.  

Myers: Is biogas capture becoming a greater trend?

Dyson: Yes. I think it’s going to have to be. It is moving, it has been moving in that direction. I think there’s going to be a bigger interest in look closer at that capture. Especially, because of the newest UN climate change documentation that just came out. I think people that are of the 20 to 40 range, their going to be really pushing to use our resources even the waste resources in a more beneficial way. And that’s certainly the attitude that BioHiTech is trying to take. But biogas, it has its uses absolutely.

I think the use of biogas in and of itself from a landfill is something that should be captured and used. However there are technologies in place, like the BioHiTech digester. Those technologies need to be evaluated. There is not going to be one solution that is going to fix this. We’ve got to use all of the capabilities that we can put in our arsenals. And that arsenal is growing all the time, not just by BioHiTech, but by the industry in general.

Myers: Have facilities been interested in achieving net zero?

Dyson: Lots of places want to achieve net zero. I mean, that’s kind of the “buzzword” right now. You have municipalities that are trying to move towards net zero. The digesters as a whole, we are one solution among many. I can think specifically of one customer that we have, Founding Farmers, a restaurant chain in the Philadelphia/D.C. area. They are doing everything they can to get themselves to a net zero. And, that’s a fantastic goal. I think all of the big chains, the Hilton Hotel chains, you see their drives to net zero. We become just one part of where we help with that.

Myers: Do you think this could become a wider trend?

Dyson: Oh, absolutely. And it’s challenging because if everybody thought of it as a way of diverting from landfills, of reducing waste. For our BioHiTech digester, we have a analytical capability with it. If people had a digester and they actually used that analytical data, they could actually reduce the waste that they generate. And that’s really where BioHiTech comes from on this. We are at the very start, educating people using the analytics that are on our machine to have them understand the waste they generate. Then from there they can start looking at their menus and saying, “Oh wow, breakfast. Tuesdays must really not be enjoying it because we throw most of it away.” They can start changing their practices. We start by education and trying to change people’s methods. Then the next thing is just using the existing infrastructure. We use the sanitary sewer and the wastewater treatment of plants, and there’s beneficial output on that. And on the end of it, we have reusable commodity. Waste becomes a commodity at that point. That’s where you find the trend of people trying to find where that waste becomes useful again. Economics is already going to be the driver, always has been.