Wastewater industry split on Trump's performance
Wastewater industry professionals are split when it comes to President Donald Trump's performance in office so far.
In a poll conducted by Wastewater Digest following President Trump's first few months in office, roughly 50% of respondents felt "very negative" or "somewhat negative" about his performance so far as it relates to the wastewater sector. Roughly 44% felt "very positive" or "somewhat positive," and around 6% were "neutral" on the topic.
Poll results
Very positive: 36%
Somewhat positive: 8%
Neutral: 6%
Somewhat negative: 5%
Very negative: 45%
Percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number.
Responses about President Trump's performance varied, with some people praising his first few months in office, while others were concerned about the future of the country. Hot topics included comments about the economy, regulations, tariffs and the environment.
Economy
Comments about the economy included worries about inflation and workforce issues. Others approved of the approach that President Trump is taking to restructure government.
"The Democratic Party with Biden as Commander In Chief created such a devastating mess by not focusing on making the economy stronger," said a respondent in other*, "very positive" on Trump.
"The current administration appears to be doing everything it can to accelerate inflation while at the same time tanking the US economy, destroying manufacturing jobs, and taking away the very safety nets and support that a government should provide to it's smaller governmental units and citizens," said a respondent in municipal government (city or county), "very negative" on Trump.
Regulations
Responses to the Trump Administration's regulatory actions varied. Industry professionals commented on how some deregulatory actions could benefit the industry, while others were suspicious about how these actions could affect the environment.
"On one hand reducing the EPA's reliance on immediately blaming all water quality issues on already heavily regulated point sources should theoretically work to push the EPA to actually identify the non-point source contributors to these issues. Unfortunately, it appears that Trump's policies will also; 1) inhibit the EPA's ability to identify non-point sources of water quality issues due to severe understaffing, 2) dumb down water quality standards in general to accommodate industrial polluters just to increase lining the pockets of the already wealthy, and 3) wreak havoc on financial stability (and thus the ability to plan ahead), customer base, proposed development, maintenance and rehabilitation work, labor, and customer costs through the perceived border crises and tariff wars that he has single-handedly created," said a respondent in municipal government (city or county), "somewhat negative" on Trump.
"It's on the right track. People need to wake up and understand that we have a lot of work to do to cut government spending. It's not something that only Trump can do, either. We have to get into agreement that it's going to take decades of dedication to keep the country solvent. Deregulation is going to play a huge role in that endeavor," said a respondent in other*, "very positive" on Trump.
"With the DOGE "cost cutting" and the "environmental deregulation", these will have catastrophic effects for the wastewater industry and the environment as a whole. It may take generations to recover from the short sidedness of this administration all in the race to cut cost so tax cuts can be given to people who don't need them," said a respondent in municipal government (city or county), "very negative" on Trump.
"The EPA has been dominated by what amounts to religious fundamentalists. The agency is forbidden to consider costs of regulations or rational benefits when making decisions," said a respondent in municipal government (city or county), "very positive" on Trump.
"Hasn't been much out there exactly what the plan is except for lots of cuts and waiving of regulations," said a respondent in municipal government (city or county), "neutral" on Trump.
Tariffs
Comments on the Trump Administration's tariff policies followed the same theme as his regulations. Respondents were evenly split, with some stating the tariffs would be good for U.S. manufacturing, while others criticized the effectiveness of the policies.
"The guy simply does not understand economics. The tariff war will destroy our economy," said a respondent in OEM, "very negative" on Trump.
"With President Trump, we will go through a period of uncertainty, but it will benefit the nation in the long run. The changes he is making will greatly benefit the nation," said a respondent in municipal government (city or county), "very positive" on Trump.
"The tariffs are going to greatly impact our business since most of our equipment is steel and aluminum. It is concerning to watch the markets plummet as we head toward a recession and the tariffs are not being removed. The reversal of all efficiency and green measures is also incredibly concerning," said a respondent in OEM, "very negative" on Trump.
"Tasks being worked on by Trump needed doing for many years, hope this is headed in an overall positive direction," said a respondent in other*, "neutral" on Trump.
Environment
Comments about the environment split the line between "very positive" and "very negative" responses. Some people applauded the effort to rework environmental regulations while others thought rollbacks could be detrimental.
"There is new direction needed. There are several years to go to work on things and the environment will be addressed. I think he realizes that there is a need for infrastructure upgrades and that PFAS is a huge issue to tackle," said a respondent in other*, "very positive" on Trump.
"If we don't intervene Trump will destroy the environment by removing current rules and giving power to those that want manufacturing back in the U.S. Lose regulations and manufactures will pollute and overload the environment. Tariffs will cause industrial pollution to take over," said a respondent in municipal government (city or county), "very negative" on Trump.
*Respondents who answered with "other" for the organization they work for did not specify which company or industry they are currently in.
About the Author
Alex Cossin
Associate Editor
Alex Cossin is the associate editor for Waterworld Magazine, Wastewater Digest and Stormwater Solutions, which compose the Endeavor Business Media Water Group. Cossin graduated from Kent State University in 2018 with a Bachelor of Science in Journalism. Cossin can be reached at [email protected].