About the author: William E. Brown, P.E., is the president and CEO of Wright-Pierce, Inc. Brown can be reached at 888.621.8156 or by e-mail at [email protected].
W. Doug Hankins, P.E., serves as secondary and tertiary systems technical leader at Wright-Pierce, Inc. Hankins can be reached at 888.621.8156 or by e-mail at [email protected].
William E. Brown & W. Doug Hankins
undefinedRelated search terms from www.waterinfolink.com: phosphorus, treatment, nutrient standards
Over the better part of the past four decades, secondary wastewater treatment has been the norm, with only a small fraction of facilities having to meet more advanced standards. However, remaining water quality concerns are making nutrient standards commonplace, and over the next few years, advanced wastewater treatment for phosphorus and nitrogen nutrient removal will become the norm.
For freshwater discharges, phosphorus is typically the nutrient of concern, while for discharges that impact marine environments or groundwater,
nitrogen is the nutrient of concern. In freshwater environments, phosphorus is often the limiting factor for algae growth and can have a significant impact on water clarity and oxygen levels. Where these water quality concerns exist, phosphorus standards are being imposed. Standards may range from 1 mg/L down to less than 0.1 mg/L depending on the receiving water quality limitations.
In the typical secondary treatment plant, about one-third of the influent phosphorus is removed via settling of insoluble forms of phosphorus and cell growth (typical cell is about 1.9% phosphorus on weight basis). To remove more phosphorus, a couple of things have to happen. First, the remaining soluble phosphorus has to be converted to an insoluble form, and then the insoluble phosphorus has to be settled or otherwise captured.
Converting Phosphorus Chemically
The most common way to convert soluble phosphorus to an insoluble form is to chemically precipitate it with a metal salt, such as alum or ferric chloride. There are a number of factors that need to be considered in selecting the best chemical or combination of chemicals, the points of addition and the appropriate dosage of chemicals.
Chemical precipitation of phosphorus is well proven and easy to install and control. With this approach, it is relatively easy to convert the majority of the phosphorus to an insoluble form. However, the lower the phosphorus limits, the higher the chemical dose required. The downsides of chemically removing phosphorus include chemical costs, increased sludge production and the difficulty of sludge dewatering. Chemical precipitation to low levels can be difficult if there is an unusual fraction of recalcitrant phosphorus. Accordingly, it is important to understand the forms of phosphorus in the waste stream, particularly if very low levels must be achieved.
Converting Phosphorus Biologically
One can also biologically convert soluble phosphorus to insoluble phosphorus. Typical wastewater microorganisms are about 1.9% phosphorus by weight. By subjecting the microorganisms to specific conditions—anaerobic conditions followed by aerobic—one can select for microorganisms (polyphosphorus bacteria) that have the ability to accumulate excess phosphorus, typically 3% to 15% phosphorus by weight.
The advantages of biologically removing the phosphorus include less sludge production, no chemical cost and improved settling due to filamentous bacteria control that results from the anaerobic zone. The typical disadvantages of biological phosphorus (bio-P) removal include higher installation costs, complexity of operation and the inability to achieve as low of soluble phosphorus concentrations as through chemical precipitation. Typically, it is assumed that bio-P strategies will only get a user down to the 0.5-mg/L range and if one needs to go lower, supplementing with chemicals would be necessary.
Separation of Solids
One of the most important issues associated with phosphorus removal is the solids-separation system. Once the phosphorus is converted to insoluble forms (chemically and/or biologically), the solids need to be captured. Which solids capturing systems are employed is a function of the effluent phosphorus standard and other treatment issues.
Typical secondary clarifiers will remove suspended forms of phosphorus to achieve a phosphorus standard in the range of 0.5 to 1 mg/L. Generally, a user has to consider advanced solids-separation systems when required to achieve limits less than 0.5 mg/L. The types of systems used are very similar to the typical equipment used for the treatment of potable water.
If faced with a phosphorus limit as low as 0.2 mg/L, filtration systems are commonly employed. These include a wide variety of sand, cloth and plastic media filters. If phosphorus limits as low as 0.1 mg/L must be achieved, ballasted and buoyant clarification systems are common—Kruger’s Actiflo process, Cambridge Water Technology’s CoMag process and Degremont Technology’s Densedag and AquaDAF processes, for example. Filtration systems preceded by high-rate settlers or dual-filtration systems in series can also be utilized for limits as low as 0.1 mg/L.
To achieve even lower limits, membrane filtration or combinations of systems in series—such as a ballasted clarification system followed by sand filtration—would be considered. For very low standards, pilot studies are appropriate to prove a technology before selecting a preferred option.
Stringent phosphorus limits are on the increase. There are many options available to achieve lower phosphorus limits. The best solution is a function of the current and future phosphorus limits, site-specific issues, operational considerations and cost. It is prudent to analyze all the options and to select a solution on life-cycle cost analysis and operational considerations.
Download: Here
